PanoTools mailing list archive

Mailinglist:PanoTools NG
Sender:paul womack
Date/Time:25-Nov-2008 10:10:56 +0100
Subject:best practise for straight line control points?

Thread:


I recently took a pseudo-scan of an old and rather fragile
map, using a pano-head pointing straight down onto the
map assembled on the floor.

The pano is approximately 4x8.

Given the nature of the subject, I want the pano
to be exactly square, so I need to set horizontal
and vertical control points - of course, being a map, there
are grid lines, ideally suited to placing such points.

But what's best?

Consider a single row of photos 1-2-3-4-5, forming
a simple horizontal panorama.

On what photos should the control pairs be?
The obvious candidate stratgies are:

1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 1-5 (all relative to the left) (and its mirror image)
3-1, 3-2, 3-4, 3-5 (all relative to the centre)
1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5 (a daisy chain)

What's best and why?

On a related note, it appears that the optimizer's
control point errors behave differently
w.r.t straight line controls, reporting large errors,
despite stitching nicely. Any know the details?

    BugBear

------------------------------------

-- 
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org
<*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines
<*> Nabble (Web) http://www.nabble.com/PanoToolsNG-f15658.html
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng
<*> Moderators/List Admins: #removed# 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:#removed# 
    mailto:#removed#

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    #removed#

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Next message:

Previous message: