PanoTools mailing list archive

Mailinglist:PanoTools NG
Sender:Matthew Rogers
Date/Time:22-Oct-2010 09:24:51 +0000
Subject:Re: Re: What's a Gigapixel?

Thread:


But the projection is irrelevant and YES a 6000 x 3000 images regardless of it's projection or content IS 18 megapixels. Stop trying to make issues where none exist.

It's the same as a megapixel, these terms are simply units that represent a quantity just like a litre, gallon, mile, kilometre etc.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/gigapixel

It's like trying to argue how long a mile is based on the type of car and speed I'm driving to cover it.

On 22 Oct 2010, at 09:33, prague wrote:

> in that logic, a 6000x3000 equirect panorama is 18 megapixels.
> 
> even though the top and bottom row of pixels (that's 18000 pixels) is in reality TWO pixels in a spherhical projection)
> 
> So sorry matt, everything is really not so simple, even if you would like it to be.
> 
> --- In #removed#, Matthew Rogers <matthew@...> wrote:
> >
> > No it simply is not, a 6mp camera like the D70 has images which are 3000px x 2000px or 6 million pixels hence 6 megapixels. You can look at it anyway you want but a gigapixel image has to be 1,000,000,000 pixels regardless of the projection, crop etc. If the final image doesn't have a billion pixels then it aint a gigapixel image.
> > 
> > I do love how panoramic photographers seem to be addicted to making things more convoluted and more difficult then necessary.
> > 
> > Matt
> > 
> > 
> > On 19 Oct 2010, at 20:39, Christian Bloch wrote:
> > 
> > > Right.
> > > 
> > > Elaborating my the chain of thought from last night, we could say that a panorama that matches the human visual field with 4 times the resolution of the human eye, is in fact a Gigapixel panorama.
> > > 
> > > (200 hFOV x 135 vFOV) x (200 pixels per degree)^2 = 1,080,000,000 pixels.
> > > 
> > > Of course, that relies on the fact that Wikipedia is right about the numbers....
> > > 
> > > Blochi
> > > 
> > > On Oct 19, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Bernhard Vogl wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I'm also using the term "pixels per degree" to explain people how 
> > > > detailed a panorama actually is. You still can cheat by using another 
> > > > projection but it is very useful to explain the difference between a 
> > > > large and a small FOV image...
> > > > 
> > > > Bernhard
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> 
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

-- 
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org
<*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines
<*> Nabble (Web) http://n4.nabble.com/PanoToolsNG-f586017.html
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng
<*> Moderators/List Admins: #removed# 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    #removed# 
    #removed#

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    #removed#

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Next message:

Previous message: