PanoTools mailing list archive
|Date/Time:|| 4-Apr-2012 13:56:31 +0000|
|Subject:||Re: D800 with 10.5mm|
--- In #removed#, "Hans" <hans@...> wrote:
> --- In #removed#, "Hans" <hans@> wrote:
> > --- In #removed#, luca vascon <luca.vascon@> wrote:
> > >
> > > On saturday I could test the camera for around 20minutes.
> > > WOW!
> > > 36 megapixels, and all of them are there!!!
> > > :-)
> > > I tested it with my shaved 10.5mm, results were amazing, I was oddly off of
> > > npp, I think. I had to retouch the whole thing a lot.
> > > Does PTGUI take in account 10.5 odd projection issues!?
> > > But, well... 13200x6600 pixel in THREE shots means something uh?!
> > > At 800 iso it keeps a very good shape, dynamic and just a subtle noise that
> > > we could call grain, and that can be changed for "detail".
> > > AMAZING camera. LV controls are now on the back, continuous shootings etc
> > > are on the top left dial and not blinded any more, there is a top button
> > > dedicated to bracketing, even if bkt interval is still limited to 1stop
> > > steps.Camera is smaller and 100g less than D700, and you can feel it.
> > > Control dials and buttons feel even more tough than usual.
> > > Part of the foolish price is due to the clean hdmi out... that categorize
> > > it under broadcast professional video equipment, and looks like they have
> > > to pay taxes for it.
> > >
> > > images here asap!!!
> > Sorry but this is not correct.
> > The max panorama size for shaved Nikkor 10.5 with 3 4912x7306 pixels images from D800 is 10236x5118
> Sorry this was wrong.
> The correct is 11360x5680 pixels.
> It may be some variation depending on your optimizing but it is far from the 13200 Luca claims.
But of course this is just about what resolution PTGui suggests you as maximum.
In reality calculating a final resolution for a panorama especially from fisheyes can only be an average resolution for the whole image as a fisheye may loose as much as 25% resolution at the corners.
Actually if you take your originals and compare to the final stitched one you will see that the center is much smaller in your panorama.
If you calculate the resolution from that area you will get 13900 from the D800, Of course this means the areas at the blending point and at the floor and ceiling will be interpolated up to 123%.
> > Not much larger than from my old 5D which gives me 6728x3364
> > And my 5D mark II gives me 8640x4320.
> > I doubt very much that the extra resolution of 10236 kontra 8640 is worth upgrading.
> > 21 mp up to 36 is in reality not much.
> > Hans
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luca Vascon.
> > >
> > > www.nuovostudio.it
> > > www.officinepanottiche.com
> > >
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org
<*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines
<*> Nabble (Web) http://panotoolsng.586017.n4.nabble.com/
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng
<*> Moderators/List Admins: #removed#
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: