PanoTools mailing list archive
|Date/Time:|| 4-May-2012 16:13:41 +0000|
|Subject:||RE: Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7|
We need center, and corner 100% crop comparisons.
I still see a bit of CA on the edges in the new version, which is why I
bring this up also since it appears to be content dependent.. I'm wondering
if the large amount of un-unused sensor area might affect it, or even mess
with consistency, for fisheyes.
Southern Digital Solutions LLC - Atlanta, Georgia
IM: <mailto:#removed#> #removed#
From: #removed# [mailto:#removed#] On
Behalf Of Hans
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:08 PM
Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
--- In #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...> wrote:
> I was hoping someone has gone through the effort of re-installing the
> previous version for a comparison on the correction.
Thats what I did.
> From: #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:#removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ]
> Behalf Of Hans
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:20 PM
> To: #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
> --- In #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> > There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
> > It's fully automatic.
> > Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual corrections
> > 6.6?
> > It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it works
> > without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
> Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
> Read my post from april 4.