--- In #removed#, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...> wrote:
>
> We need center, and corner 100% crop comparisons.
Here is a layered tif. 5d with 10.5
http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA.tif
One is manual and one is the new version 6.7 auto.
I am not going to tell you which is what.
Hans
>
> J
>
> I still see a bit of CA on the edges in the new version, which is why I
> bring this up also since it appears to be content dependent.. I'm wondering
> if the large amount of un-unused sensor area might affect it, or even mess
> with consistency, for fisheyes.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Sacha Griffin
>
> Southern Digital Solutions LLC - Atlanta, Georgia
>
> <http://www.seeit360.com/> http://www.seeit360.com
>
> <http://twitter.com/SeeIt360> http://twitter.com/SeeIt360
>
> <http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360> http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360
>
> IM: <mailto:sachagriffin007@...> sachagriffin007@...
>
> Office: 404-551-4275
>
>
>
>
>
> From: #removed# [mailto:#removed#] On
> Behalf Of Hans
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:08 PM
> To: #removed#
> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> >
> > I was hoping someone has gone through the effort of re-installing the
> > previous version for a comparison on the correction.
>
> Thats what I did.
>
> Hans
>
> >
> >
> >
> > sacha
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:#removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ]
> On
> > Behalf Of Hans
> > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:20 PM
> > To: #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> > >
> > > There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
> > >
> > > It's fully automatic.
> > >
> > > Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual corrections
> > with
> > > 6.6?
> > >
> > > It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it works
> > > without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
> > >
> >
> > Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
> > Read my post from april 4.
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/53755
> >
> > Hans
> >
> > .
> >
> >
> >
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=18227848/grpspId=1705006496/msgI
> > d=54114/stime=1336087215/nc1=5522123/nc2=4025321/nc3=3848642>
> >
>
------------------------------------
--
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org
<*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines
<*> Nabble (Web) http://panotoolsng.586017.n4.nabble.com/
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng
<*> Moderators/List Admins: #removed#
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
#removed#
#removed#
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
#removed#
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Next message:
Previous message: