I'm not seeing huge differences between the two, but the background layer
seems to have slightly less purple fringing. Also, less falloff at the
edges. And the winner is...?
Thanks for posting the image!
Mark
www.northernlight.net
www.virtual-travels.com
www.pinnacle-vr.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: #removed# [mailto:#removed#] On
> Behalf Of Hans
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:57 PM
> To: #removed#
> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
>
>
>
> --- In #removed#, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > We need center, and corner 100% crop comparisons.
>
> Here is a layered tif. 5d with 10.5
>
> http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA.tif
>
> One is manual and one is the new version 6.7 auto.
>
> I am not going to tell you which is what.
>
> Hans
>
> >
> > J
> >
> > I still see a bit of CA on the edges in the new version, which is why I
> > bring this up also since it appears to be content dependent.. I'm
> wondering
> > if the large amount of un-unused sensor area might affect it, or even
> mess
> > with consistency, for fisheyes.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Sacha Griffin
> >
> > Southern Digital Solutions LLC - Atlanta, Georgia
> >
> > <http://www.seeit360.com/> http://www.seeit360.com
> >
> > <http://twitter.com/SeeIt360> http://twitter.com/SeeIt360
> >
> > <http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360> http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360
> >
> > IM: <mailto:sachagriffin007@...> sachagriffin007@...
> >
> > Office: 404-551-4275
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: #removed# [mailto:#removed#]
> On
> > Behalf Of Hans
> > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:08 PM
> > To: #removed#
> > Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In #removed#
> <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I was hoping someone has gone through the effort of re-installing the
> > > previous version for a comparison on the correction.
> >
> > Thats what I did.
> >
> > Hans
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > sacha
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: #removed#
> <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:#removed#
> <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ]
> > On
> > > Behalf Of Hans
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:20 PM
> > > To: #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In #removed#
> <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > > "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
> > > >
> > > > It's fully automatic.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual
> corrections
> > > with
> > > > 6.6?
> > > >
> > > > It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it
> works
> > > > without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
> > > >
> > >
> > > Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
> > > Read my post from april 4.
> > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/53755
> > >
> > > Hans
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=18227848/grpspId=1705006496/ms
> gI
> > > d=54114/stime=1336087215/nc1=5522123/nc2=4025321/nc3=3848642>
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> --
>
>
>
------------------------------------
--
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org
<*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines
<*> Nabble (Web) http://panotoolsng.586017.n4.nabble.com/
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng
<*> Moderators/List Admins: #removed#
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
#removed#
#removed#
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
#removed#
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Next message:
Previous message: