Hans, how about posting 100% crops of a corner or something?
Your samples are huge and take a long time to download.
Hans wrote:
>
> --- In #removed#, "Hans" <hans@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> --- In #removed#, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
>>> We need center, and corner 100% crop comparisons.
>> Here is a layered tif. 5d with 10.5
>>
>> http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA.tif
>>
>> One is manual and one is the new version 6.7 auto.
>>
>> I am not going to tell you which is what.
>
>
> Here is another one which has a nasty bluefringe which is almost impossible to remove completely without extra desatuarion
>
> It's Tokina 10-17 at 10mm.
> http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA-tokina.tif
>
> Hans
>
>> Hans
>>
>>> J
>>>
>>> I still see a bit of CA on the edges in the new version, which is why I
>>> bring this up also since it appears to be content dependent.. I'm wondering
>>> if the large amount of un-unused sensor area might affect it, or even mess
>>> with consistency, for fisheyes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sacha Griffin
>>>
>>> Southern Digital Solutions LLC - Atlanta, Georgia
>>>
>>> <http://www.seeit360.com/> http://www.seeit360.com
>>>
>>> <http://twitter.com/SeeIt360> http://twitter.com/SeeIt360
>>>
>>> <http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360> http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360
>>>
>>> IM: <mailto:sachagriffin007@> sachagriffin007@
>>>
>>> Office: 404-551-4275
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: #removed# [mailto:#removed#] On
>>> Behalf Of Hans
>>> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:08 PM
>>> To: #removed#
>>> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --- In #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
>>> "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
>>>> I was hoping someone has gone through the effort of re-installing the
>>>> previous version for a comparison on the correction.
>>> Thats what I did.
>>>
>>> Hans
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> sacha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
>>> [mailto:#removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ]
>>> On
>>>> Behalf Of Hans
>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:20 PM
>>>> To: #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
>>>> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- In #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
>>> <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
>>>> "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
>>>>> There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's fully automatic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual corrections
>>>> with
>>>>> 6.6?
>>>>>
>>>>> It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it works
>>>>> without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
>>>>>
>>>> Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
>>>> Read my post from april 4.
>>>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/53755
>>>>
>>>> Hans
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=18227848/grpspId=1705006496/msgI
>>>> d=54114/stime=1336087215/nc1=5522123/nc2=4025321/nc3=3848642>
>>>>
>
>
>
------------------------------------
--
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org
<*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines
<*> Nabble (Web) http://panotoolsng.586017.n4.nabble.com/
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng
<*> Moderators/List Admins: #removed#
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
#removed#
#removed#
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
#removed#
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Next message:
Previous message: