Pretty crappy image Hans for a comparison, little good subject matter to see
aberration and the background layer one is over sharpened and has sharpening
halos comparatively.
I still think Layer 1 is better in aberration.. but its close enough not to
care about any more.
Thanks for the examples.
Best Regards,
Sacha Griffin
Southern Digital Solutions LLC - Atlanta, Georgia
<http://www.seeit360.com/> http://www.seeit360.com
<http://twitter.com/SeeIt360> http://twitter.com/SeeIt360
<http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360> http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360
IM: <mailto:#removed#> #removed#
Office: 404-551-4275
From: #removed# [mailto:#removed#] On
Behalf Of Hans
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 1:42 PM
To: #removed#
Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
--- In #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Hans" <hans@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> >
> > We need center, and corner 100% crop comparisons.
>
> Here is a layered tif. 5d with 10.5
>
> http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA.tif
>
> One is manual and one is the new version 6.7 auto.
>
> I am not going to tell you which is what.
Here is another one which has a nasty bluefringe which is almost impossible
to remove completely without extra desatuarion
It's Tokina 10-17 at 10mm.
http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA-tokina.tif
Hans
>
> Hans
>
> >
> > J
> >
> > I still see a bit of CA on the edges in the new version, which is why I
> > bring this up also since it appears to be content dependent.. I'm
wondering
> > if the large amount of un-unused sensor area might affect it, or even
mess
> > with consistency, for fisheyes.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Sacha Griffin
> >
> > Southern Digital Solutions LLC - Atlanta, Georgia
> >
> > <http://www.seeit360.com/> http://www.seeit360.com
> >
> > <http://twitter.com/SeeIt360> http://twitter.com/SeeIt360
> >
> > <http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360> http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360
> >
> > IM: <mailto:sachagriffin007@> sachagriffin007@
> >
> > Office: 404-551-4275
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:#removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ]
On
> > Behalf Of Hans
> > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:08 PM
> > To: #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In #removed#
<mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I was hoping someone has gone through the effort of re-installing the
> > > previous version for a comparison on the correction.
> >
> > Thats what I did.
> >
> > Hans
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > sacha
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: #removed#
<mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:#removed#
<mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ]
> > On
> > > Behalf Of Hans
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:20 PM
> > > To: #removed# <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In #removed#
<mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > > "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
> > > >
> > > > It's fully automatic.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual
corrections
> > > with
> > > > 6.6?
> > > >
> > > > It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it
works
> > > > without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
> > > >
> > >
> > > Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
> > > Read my post from april 4.
> > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/53755
> > >
> > > Hans
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=18227848/grpspId=1705006496/msgI
> > > d=54114/stime=1336087215/nc1=5522123/nc2=4025321/nc3=3848642>
> > >
> >
>
Next message:
Previous message: