Perfectly good. The 16mm is of course way better than the 10.5mm ... but
the 10.5 is still very good.
Admittedly my eyesight isn't what it used to be, but I can't see any
indication of "horrible" in either pano.
Trausti
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Ken Warner <#removed#> wrote:
> **
>
>
> Why do you say that? They looked sparkling to me. Maybe there was moire
> with you display pixels. I noticed that in a small window there was some
> shimmering but full screen they cleared up.
>
> Or are you joking and I'm too stupid to get the joke??? (-:
>
>
> jrgen_schrader wrote:
> > Hm - to me they both look horrible :)
> > Would you mind to give some more details?
> > How did you treat the images, if at all?
> >
> > Cheers
> > J?rgen
> >
>
Next message:
Previous message: