PanoTools mailing list archive
|Date/Time:|| 9-May-2012 09:17:10 +0000|
|Subject:||Re: Re: Nikon D800 test with 16mm and 10.5mm|
Perfectly good. The 16mm is of course way better than the 10.5mm ... but
the 10.5 is still very good.
Admittedly my eyesight isn't what it used to be, but I can't see any
indication of "horrible" in either pano.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Ken Warner <#removed#> wrote:
> Why do you say that? They looked sparkling to me. Maybe there was moire
> with you display pixels. I noticed that in a small window there was some
> shimmering but full screen they cleared up.
> Or are you joking and I'm too stupid to get the joke??? (-:
> jrgen_schrader wrote:
> > Hm - to me they both look horrible :)
> > Would you mind to give some more details?
> > How did you treat the images, if at all?
> > Cheers
> > J?rgen