PanoTools mailing list archive

Mailinglist:PanoTools NG
Sender:Jeffrey Martin
Date/Time:10-May-2012 13:40:25 +0000
Subject:wembley gigapixel 2012

Thread:

> wembley gigapixel 2012 - Jeffrey Martin - 2012-05-10 15:40:25
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - guillaume_fulchiron - 2012-05-10 23:18:42
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Hans - 2012-05-11 00:08:48
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Hans - 2012-05-11 00:39:02
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - panoramicsdk - 2012-05-11 00:42:09
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Peter - 2012-05-11 14:24:15
Re: Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Luc Villeneuve - 2012-05-11 14:33:36
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - prague - 2012-05-12 19:03:22
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - prague - 2012-05-12 19:02:00
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Hans - 2012-05-13 00:35:07
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - prague - 2012-05-14 09:28:12
Re: Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Will Pearson - 2012-05-14 10:32:09
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - prague - 2012-05-14 21:50:22
Re: Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Ben Knill - 2012-05-14 10:43:02
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - jrgen_schrader - 2012-05-14 21:53:08

a pano of this size turned out to be not entirely doable in 24 hours with
the equipment and planning I did.

people here, you might only see errors. but you have no idea how ugly the
process really was to get the image in this shape.

it is actually a miracle that anything got online at all :) and that was
with a 16-core 192GB ram workstation.

http://wembley360.wembleystadium.com

the next one will be this size, but perfect..... :)

Next message:

Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - guillaume_fulchiron - 2012-05-10 23:18:42

Previous message:

Re: Nikon D800 test with 16mm and 10.5mm - Paul Fretheim - 2012-05-10 02:32:30