PanoTools mailing list archive

Mailinglist:PanoTools NG
Sender:prague
Date/Time:12-May-2012 17:03:22 +0000
Subject:Re: wembley gigapixel 2012

Thread:

wembley gigapixel 2012 - Jeffrey Martin - 2012-05-10 15:40:25
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - guillaume_fulchiron - 2012-05-10 23:18:42
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Hans - 2012-05-11 00:08:48
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Hans - 2012-05-11 00:39:02
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - panoramicsdk - 2012-05-11 00:42:09
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Peter - 2012-05-11 14:24:15
Re: Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Luc Villeneuve - 2012-05-11 14:33:36
> Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - prague - 2012-05-12 19:03:22
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - prague - 2012-05-12 19:02:00
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Hans - 2012-05-13 00:35:07
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - prague - 2012-05-14 09:28:12
Re: Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Will Pearson - 2012-05-14 10:32:09
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - prague - 2012-05-14 21:50:22
Re: Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Ben Knill - 2012-05-14 10:43:02
Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - jrgen_schrader - 2012-05-14 21:53:08

There were many problems.

Mainly, they wanted a larger image than last year, and it was hard to do that :) and I probably didn't prepare for it quite as much as I should have.

However there were some really weird stitching problems that I couldn't solve even one week later. One of those mysteries that I might never solve.

Jeff



--- In #removed#, Luc Villeneuve <luc_villeneuve@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeffrey,
> 
> So... After all that hard work. What was the main problem? The shooting? The software workflow? 
> 
> Could you improve the image by shooting top->down instead left->right?
> 
> If you use PTGUI, couldn't you create a template prior to the event of the stadium, and just apply the template with the action shots to process the "real" images?
> 
> Luc
> 
> 
> On 11 mai 2012, at 08:24, Peter wrote:
> 
> > So, was it worth doing? I mean, it is a very remarkable image, but what is the gratification? Were you well paid to create it or was it a labor of love?
> > 
> > --- In #removed#, Jeffrey Martin <panoramas@> wrote:
> > >
> > > a pano of this size turned out to be not entirely doable in 24 hours with
> > > the equipment and planning I did.
> > > 
> > > people here, you might only see errors. but you have no idea how ugly the
> > > process really was to get the image in this shape.
> > > 
> > > it is actually a miracle that anything got online at all :) and that was
> > > with a 16-core 192GB ram workstation.
> > > 
> > > http://wembley360.wembleystadium.com
> > > 
> > > the next one will be this size, but perfect..... :)
> > >
> > 
> >
>




------------------------------------

-- 
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org
<*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines
<*> Nabble (Web) http://panotoolsng.586017.n4.nabble.com/
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng
<*> Moderators/List Admins: #removed# 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    #removed# 
    #removed#

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    #removed#

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Next message:

Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - Hans - 2012-05-13 00:35:07

Previous message:

Re: wembley gigapixel 2012 - prague - 2012-05-12 19:02:00