It's a real shame that the work Jeffrey does to further the industry get's
this kind of reaction from a community who ultimately benefits.
Whatever the issues, these panoramas are being used at major global events
by many thousands of people who may not have come across the technology
otherwise.
Congratulations Jeffrey. I personally applaud what your doing.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:28 PM, prague <#removed#> wrote:
> **
>
>
>
> Hi hans,
>
> I was going to reply to your message, but it's not worth using the neurons
> in my brain.
>
> Anyway, you're right that it's a good thing you're not my client.
>
> What makes me rather sad is the way you troll me, every step of the way,
> for many years now.
>
> I guess everyone needs a hobby.
>
> cheers,
> Jeffrey
>
>
> --- In #removed#, "Hans" <hans@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In #removed#, Jeffrey Martin <panoramas@> wrote:
> > >
> > > a pano of this size turned out to be not entirely doable in 24 hours
> with
> > > the equipment and planning I did.
> > >
> > > people here, you might only see errors. but you have no idea how ugly
> the
> > > process really was to get the image in this shape.
> > >
> > > it is actually a miracle that anything got online at all :) and that
> was
> > > with a 16-core 192GB ram workstation.
> > >
> > > http://wembley360.wembleystadium.com
> > >
> > > the next one will be this size, but perfect..... :)
> > >
> >
> > "At whopping 23-gigapixels, #
> >
> > Well maybe your original photos are that but presented size is
> 90.000x180.000 = 16,2 megapixel and that includes a white sky and a nadir
> logo.
> >
> > In reality it is just around 65 degree vertical FOV which is a
> 30.000x180.000 useable area = 5.4 megapixel .
> >
> > Clients are easy to cheat. Photographers not.
> >
> > Good Luck next time.
> >
> > Hans
> >
>
>
>
Next message:
Previous message: