PanoTools mailing list archive

Mailinglist:PanoTools NG
Sender:prague
Date/Time:14-May-2012 19:50:22 +0000
Subject:Re: wembley gigapixel 2012

Thread:



Hi Will,

the full image size was 340,000 pixels wide. no matter how you might want to count it, it was MORE than the 25 gigapixels stated.

i made the final version 180,000 pixels as a balance between size, quality, performance, and the time needed to save, tile, and upload the final image (the clock was ticking)

cheers,
Jeffrey

--- In #removed#, Will Pearson <list@...> wrote:
>
> Hans raises a valid point, if I were selling my images by the pixel I'd make sure they were true pixels and I'd be clear about how I calculated them. I'd be interested to read your response to the technical analysis in Hans' email.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Will
> 
> 
> On 14 May 2012, at 08:28, prague wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Hi hans,
> > 
> > I was going to reply to your message, but it's not worth using the neurons in my brain. 
> > 
> > Anyway, you're right that it's a good thing you're not my client.
> > 
> > What makes me rather sad is the way you troll me, every step of the way, for many years now. 
> > 
> > I guess everyone needs a hobby.
> > 
> > cheers,
> > Jeffrey
> > 
> > --- In #removed#, "Hans" <hans@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In #removed#, Jeffrey Martin <panoramas@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > a pano of this size turned out to be not entirely doable in 24 hours with
> > > > the equipment and planning I did.
> > > > 
> > > > people here, you might only see errors. but you have no idea how ugly the
> > > > process really was to get the image in this shape.
> > > > 
> > > > it is actually a miracle that anything got online at all :) and that was
> > > > with a 16-core 192GB ram workstation.
> > > > 
> > > > http://wembley360.wembleystadium.com
> > > > 
> > > > the next one will be this size, but perfect..... :)
> > > >
> > > 
> > > "At whopping 23-gigapixels, #
> > > 
> > > Well maybe your original photos are that but presented size is 90.000x180.000 = 16,2 megapixel and that includes a white sky and a nadir logo.
> > > 
> > > In reality it is just around 65 degree vertical FOV which is a 30.000x180.000 useable area = 5.4 megapixel .
> > > 
> > > Clients are easy to cheat. Photographers not.
> > > 
> > > Good Luck next time.
> > > 
> > > Hans
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> > ______________________________________________________________________
>



------------------------------------

-- 
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org
<*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines
<*> Nabble (Web) http://panotoolsng.586017.n4.nabble.com/
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng
<*> Moderators/List Admins: #removed# 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    #removed# 
    #removed#

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    #removed#

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Next message:

Previous message: