PanoTools mailing list archive
|Date/Time:||15-May-2012 16:19:44 +0000|
|Subject:||Re: OT -- a question -- Re: Nikon D800 test with 16mm and 10.5mm|
I'm perfectly aware of Madoka 360, but I feel the circular fish to be of
quite zero interest panoramicwise.
A cropped circular, instead, is perfect. I mean 7.5 samyang adapted to nex.
Lens producers do not give a dam to us, they will always think in a matter
of circular or diagonal.
2012/5/10 Ken Warner <#removed#>
> That Madoka fisheye has been lurking around for a while. I wish Sigma
> would make some more E-mount lenses. Sigma is making a few and they get
> high marks. Then Samyang has been promising an E-mount fisheye for almost
> a year now.
> Mirrorless cameras seem like a no-brainer way to make a better, cheaper,
> smaller camera.
> Jesse Garnier wrote:
> > On 5/9/12 12:42 PM, Ken Warner wrote:
> >> So as mirror-flap becomes a problem to overcome -- how does that reflect
> >> on mirrorless cameras as a possible avenue for reducing that particular
> >> problem?
> > Great question. I look forward to finding out soon, now that a circular
> > fisheye is imminent for some of the mirrorless bodies. I hadn't seen the
> > Yasuhara fisheye mentioned here. Might have missed it:
> > --
> > Jesse Garnier
> > San Francisco, Calif.
> > http://stonehopper.com/360