PanoTools mailing list archive

Mailinglist:PanoTools NG
Sender:luca vascon
Date/Time:15-May-2012 16:19:44 +0000
Subject:Re: OT -- a question -- Re: Nikon D800 test with 16mm and 10.5mm

Thread:


I'm perfectly aware of Madoka 360, but I feel the circular fish to be of
quite zero interest panoramicwise.
A cropped circular, instead, is perfect. I mean 7.5 samyang adapted to nex.
Lens producers do not give a dam to us, they will always think in a matter
of circular or diagonal.

2012/5/10 Ken Warner <#removed#>

> That Madoka fisheye has been lurking around for a while.  I wish Sigma
> would make some more E-mount lenses.  Sigma is making a few and they get
> high marks.  Then Samyang has been promising an E-mount fisheye for almost
> a year now.
>
> Mirrorless cameras seem like a no-brainer way to make a better, cheaper,
> smaller camera.
>
> Jesse Garnier wrote:
> > On 5/9/12 12:42 PM, Ken Warner wrote:
> >
> >> So as mirror-flap becomes a problem to overcome -- how does that reflect
> >> on mirrorless cameras as a possible avenue for reducing that particular
> >> problem?
> >
> > Great question. I look forward to finding out soon, now that a circular
> > fisheye is imminent for some of the mirrorless bodies. I hadn't seen the
> > Yasuhara fisheye mentioned here. Might have missed it:
> >
> >
> http://www.43rumors.com/yasuhara-plans-to-make-a-crazy-vest-pocket-kodak...
> >
> http://www.ephotozine.com/article/yasuhara-madoka-180-fish-eye-for-m43-a...
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Garnier
> > San Francisco, Calif.
> > http://stonehopper.com/360
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> --
>
>
>
>


-- 
Luca Vascon.

www.nuovostudio.it
www.officinepanottiche.com

Next message:

Previous message: