PanoTools mailing list archive

Mailinglist:proj-imim
Sender:uwai
Date/Time:2001-Apr-24 16:03:10
Subject:RE: FoV versus focal length formula for fisheye lenses?

Thread:


proj-imim: RE: FoV versus focal length formula for fisheye lenses? uwai 2001-Apr-24 16:03:10
Hi,

"fov" meant the angle from optical axis (0 to 90 degrees (= pi/2 rad) for
most circular fisheye) in the formula.

If a lens projects hemisphere to 23 mm diameter circle,
the f must be about 7.3 mm with equidistant projection.
Or 8.1 mm with equal area projection.

However, the commercial product is not necessarily filling the formula
completely.

Usefull link;
http://www.coastalopt.com/ne080400.htm 

I think nikon 8mm F2.8, 6mm F2.8, 6mm F5.6, FC-E8 + E900 master lens are
designed as equidistant, while olympus 8mm F2.8, sigma 8mm F4(MF) are as
equal area.

Sorry for poor english.

Uwai
http://nagoya.cool.ne.jp/uwai

--- Joost Nieuwenhuijse <#removed#>$B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?!'(B
> Thanks.
> I guess the first is the most common? I've never heard of a 12mm
> fisheye
> giving 180 degrees coverage.
> 
> Joost
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > w = f * fov (fov in radian) for equidistant projection.
> >
> > w = 2 * f * sin(fov/2)      for equal area projection.
> >
> > Almost all fisheyes are designed as one of the two projections.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
$B%$%s%9%?%s%H%a%C%;!<%8$rAw$m$&!*(B Yahoo!$B%a%C%;%s%8%c!<(B
http://messenger.yahoo.co.jp/




Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page