PanoTools mailing list archive

Mailinglist:PanoTools
Sender:ptgroup
Date/Time:2006-Jun-10 12:23:28
Subject:AW: 10.5 mm Calculations

Thread:


PanoTools: AW: 10.5 mm Calculations ptgroup 2006-Jun-10 12:23:28
Carlos:
do you use it shaved ??
Ciao
Mike


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: #removed# [mailto:#removed#]Im Auftrag
von Carlos Chegado - www.netlojas.biz
Gesendet: Samstag, 10. Juni 2006 12:02
An: #removed#
Betreff: Re: [PanoTools] 10.5 mm Calculations


Landis,

I use the Canon 5D and Nikkor 10.5 f:2.8 Fisheye and find that 3 shots
around are enough for a good stitch.
I tried outdoors on several locations and found no problems yet using 3
shots, for me it has enough overlap.
Saves a lot of hard disk space it's faster to process.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Carlos Chegado

Olho de Peixe Lda






Landis wrote:

> Can someone please verify or correct my following calculations?
>
> I'm trying to figure out the best resolution and number of shots to
> use with a couple different cameras using the Nikkor 10.5 (shaved or
> not, depending on sensor size).
>
> --
>
> Camera: Nikon D100
> Multiplier: 1.5x
> Resolution: 6.1MP (3008x2000)
> Max 360 Resolution: 8,045px wide
> Shooting Pattern: 6+1+1 (6 around, zenith, and nadir)
>
> Camera: Nikon D200
> Multiplier: 1.5x
> Resolution: 10.2MP (3875x2592)
> Max 360 Resolution: 10,426px wide
> Shooting Pattern: 6+1+1
>
> Camera: Nikon D2x
> Multiplier: 1.5x
> Resolution: 12.4MP (4288x2848)
> Max 360 Resolution: 11,456px wide
> Shooting Pattern: 6+1+1
>
> --
>
> Camera: Kodak Pro SLR/n (no adapter, needs shave)
> Multiplier: 1.0x
> Resolution: 13.5MP (4500x3000)
> Max 360 Resolution: 7,770px wide
> Shooting Pattern: 4 (could probably get away with only 3)
>
> --
>
> Camera: Canon 20D (needs adapter, no need to shave)
> Multiplier: 1.6x
> Resolution: 8.2MP (3504x2336)
> Max 360 Resolution: 10,059px wide
> Shooting Pattern: 6+1+1
>
> Camera: Canon 5D (needs adapter, needs shave)
> Multiplier: 1.0x
> Resolution: 12.8MP (4368x2912)
> Max 360 Resolution: 7,542px wide
> Shooting Pattern: 4 (could probably get away with only 3)
>
> ----
>
> So the major advantage of this lens on a full frame camera is only
> less photos, because even with double the resolution of a Nikon D100,
> the Canon 5D can't output higher resolution final panoramas.
>
> I love the idea of fewer shots, but I'm just trying to make sure I
> have all the facts and assumptions straight before I make any final
> decisions.
>
> Thanks for any input!
>
> -Landis
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







Yahoo! Groups Links









--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/360 - Release Date: 09.06.2006


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/360 - Release Date: 09.06.2006



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
You can search right from your browser? It's easy and it's free.  See how.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/.Cr1lB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

<*> PanoTools.Info Wiki
    http://wiki.panotools.org

<*> PanoTools.Info List Archives
    http://lists.panotools.info/pipermail/ptml/

<*> PanoTools List Reader @ GMane:
    http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.panotools
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoTools/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    #removed#

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page