PanoTools NG:
Re: Some more tests on Optimal Cubefaces.
philipp_koch_als_name_gibts_oft 2008-Nov-01 12:33:30
Hans,
thanks for your efforts to share your findings with us! Hhm, but I
must admit I'm not sure if I do understand this correctly. Do you mean
it's possible to shrink the equirectangular image to 70% of its
original size and divide the corresponding image width by pi without
visible image detail loss? Sorry, maybe this is a dumb question, but I
simply could not get the same values when looking at the example on
your website.
To make it simple: Say, there is an equirectangular image with 1000 x
500 px.
1000 x 0.7 = 700
700 / pi = 222.8169203
So, one could shrink the equirectangular image to 700 x 350 px in
Photoshop and convert this image to six 222 x 222 px cube faces?
Or am I getting something totally wrong here?
Thanks in advance,
Philipp
--- In #removed#, "Hans Nyberg" <hans@...> wrote:
>
> I have made some more tests on the optimal cubeface sizes.
> http://www.panoramas.dk/cubefaces/
>
> Hans
>
------------------------------------
--
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org
<*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines
<*> Nabble (Web) http://www.nabble.com/PanoToolsNG-f15658.html
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng
<*> Moderators/List Admins: #removed#
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:#removed#
mailto:#removed#
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
#removed#
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/