| Mailinglist: | PanoTools NG |
| Sender: | Erik Krause |
| Date/Time: | 2008-Nov-01 21:59:40 |
| Subject: | Re: Some more tests on Optimal Cubefaces. |
Am Saturday, November 01, 2008 um 17:55 schrieb Philipp B. Koch: > Thanks a lot, Erik! I've tried both Lanczos3 and Mitchell with DOSUP > like you proposed. The visual difference is surely worth the (much) > longer processing time it takes compared to spline64... How much do you downsample? I did some tests some time ago and found no big difference for a 4000x2000 to cubefaces 1200 remapping tasks. -> http://www.panotools.org/mailarchive/msg/41713#msg41713 I stopped testing, since the old fixed kernel size interpolators and the anti-alaising ones are not comparable. The kernel size (and hence the execution time) highly depends on whether downsampling or upsampling, and they increase for downsampling: http://www.panotools.org/mailarchive/msg/41703#msg41703 best regards -- Erik Krause Offenburger Str. 33 79108 Freiburg ------------------------------------ -- <*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org <*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines <*> Nabble (Web) http://www.nabble.com/PanoToolsNG-f15658.html <*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng <*> Moderators/List Admins: #removed# Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:#removed# mailto:#removed# <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: #removed# <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/