PanoTools mailing list archive

Mailinglist:PanoTools NG
Sender:ptgroup
Date/Time:2007-May-16 14:10:57
Subject:AW: Re: Sigma 8 F3.5 and its sharpness

Thread:


PanoTools NG: AW: Re: Sigma 8 F3.5 and its sharpness ptgroup 2007-May-16 14:10:57
John:
as you said before an Hans also:
if your lens is calibrated 2/3 Point are sufficient.
But this you have to proof otherwise you need the mentioned amount of points.
Ciao
Mike
http://www.netzserver1.de/pg8
-------------------------
  -----Urspr?iche Nachricht-----
  Von: #removed# [mailto:#removed#]Im Auftrag von John Houghton
  Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2007 10:44
  An: #removed#
  Betreff: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Sigma 8 F3.5 and its sharpness


  --- In #removed#, "Roger D. Williams" <roger@...>
  wrote:
  >
  > On panoramas made from hand-held shots and to a lesser extent from a
  > camera on a unipod, there are up to six degrees of freedom for the
  > relative camera movements between shots. Since it would take at
  > least two points to define each degree of freedom, that makes at
  > least 12 points at each seam as an absolute mininum. In view of the
  > warping that is also going on, I would have thought double that to
  > be no more than a safe minimum.

  Roger, I don't mind at all you putting forward a differing point of
  view. A lot depends on the subject of the panorama. In the great
  outdoors, you usually have some features a relatively long way away.
  Any positioning errors of the camera are of little consequence. If
  you move the camera up by an inch, it will have no material effect on
  the imaging of the distant features. If you have managed to evaluate
  some good lens parameters in a calibration exercise, the image
  warping will be taken care of, though the lens fov and shift
  parameters should be optimized. When the images are remapped onto
  the spherical stitching surface, in principle only two points per
  seam are enough to align the images, but the alignment is only going
  to be good for the remote parts of the images.

  In practice, more than 2 points per seam are desirable. One has to
  treat each panorama according to circumstances and I wouldn't rule
  anything out. It's the final result that matters.

  John



  


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



-- 
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org/

<*> Nabble (web) http://www.nabble.com/PanoToolsNG-f15658.html

<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng/

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:#removed# 
    mailto:#removed#

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    #removed#

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page