PanoTools NG:
AW: AW: Re: Sigma 8 F3.5 and its sharpness
ptgroup 2007-May-17 11:32:00
Paul;
may be I didn´t choose the right words.
With calibrated I wanted to say the proper "Correction Parameters"
This is the PTGUI-right expression.
I confirmed these parameters with an easy image and very good spread CPs
(auto & manual set)
It gives me much better results now- only y,p,r otpimized and a "very good" stitch,
sometimes h/vshift if the crop circle is not set so good.
http://www.netzserver1.de/pg
-------------------------
-----Urspr?iche Nachricht-----
Von: #removed# [mailto:#removed#]Im Auftrag von Paul F
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Mai 2007 09:40
An: #removed#
Betreff: Re: AW: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Sigma 8 F3.5 and its sharpness
On 16 May 2007, at 13:05, ptgroup wrote:
> John:
> as you said before an Hans also:
> if your lens is calibrated 2/3 Point are sufficient.
> But this you have to proof otherwise you need the mentioned amount
> of points.
> Ciao
> Mike
>
Hi mike
just to confirm, by calibration you mean using exif data and setting
the image circle?
or is there another way of calibrating that I am missing?
thanks
P
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
--
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org/
<*> Nabble (web) http://www.nabble.com/PanoToolsNG-f15658.html
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:#removed#
mailto:#removed#
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
#removed#
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/