PanoTools mailing list archive

Mailinglist:PanoTools NG
Sender:Fulvio Senore
Date/Time:2006-Sep-05 16:17:39
Subject:Re: Re: Which viewer to use...

Thread:


PanoTools NG: Re: Re: Which viewer to use... Fulvio Senore 2006-Sep-05 16:17:39

scannerist ha scritto:
> --- In #removed#, Fulvio Senore <mailing@...> wrote:
>   
>> scannerist ha scritto:
>>     
>>> --- In #removed#, Fulvio Senore <mailing@> wrote:
>>>       
>> It think that a good solution is to use java to show a relatively small
>> version of the pano as a first step. Then you could use QTVR to show
>> fullscreens for those who have it installed. You could also try to
>> detect the installed viewer and act accordingly, but this would require
>> dynamic page generation.
>>     
>
> Do you have a range of image sizes and compression rates you're 
> comfortable with for the small version and for the large version?
>
>   
Compression rates do not change the memory requirements, they only 
affect the download time.
About image sizes, I cannot help you. I usually take landscape panos 
from mountain tops where there is not much interest in looking at your 
feet, so I create images with a limited vertical field of view. As a 
result memory is not an issue even with large images, since the 
equirectangular image has a very limited height leading to a limited 
memory requirements.
Using 360x180 degrees panos requires a lot more memory.
>> Since all users have the same amount of memory it is probably better to
>> create images small enough than to create larger images and have the
>> clients to downsize them after a longer download.
>>     
>
> Given those preferences, what viewer and image sizes are you talking
> about?
>   
The question is not very clear to me. If you want to compute the image 
size needed to show a pano in a window of a given size you can use a 
simple formula:

panoWidth = (viewerWidth*360)/hFov

where hFov is the horizontal field of view of the viewer, in degrees. 
The formula gives you the size needed to view the pano at a zoom level 
of 100% in the viewer.
I have found that it is better to use a slightly larger pano image for 
best results, say 10-20% more.

Of course the formula holds for every viewer.

Fulvio Senore



--
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org/

<*> Gmane (news) nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.panotools.ng

<*> Gmane  (web) http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.panotools.ng

<*> Nabble (web) http://www.nabble.com/PanoToolsNG-f15658.html

<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng/

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    #removed#

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Next thread:

Previous thread:

back to search page