Mailinglist archive

Hello everybody

I did check if the script* as an effect on loading speed with IE, my
conclusion is it has no effect what ever the size i put in the script or
the file size, on a macintosh.

Off line, on a G4,
Applet with hotspots and scripts, or applet with a clean page and no
hotspots

? 1600*800 file
Netscape 4.72                    6 sec
Internet Explorer  5           14 sec

? 3800*1900 file
Netscape 4.72                    20 sec
Internet Explorer  5            48 sec

It is always the double in IE5 ?

But the most ennoying problem, as i said before, i that Netscape memory
will grow each time you reload the applet !
With the big file it grows of 50 megs for each loading?

And the good news is the big file pans quit fast in Netscape ?

* Helmut's script used
<script language="JavaScript">
   if (navigator.appName != 'Netscape')
     document.write('<PARAM name=maxarray
value="5000000">');
 </script>

I tried 5 000 000 and 50 000 000 ?

Best Regards

Denis

Gummy Bear wrote:

> Helmut,
>
> I just performed another test of PTViewer 0.9 on my
> 56K dial up connection.
>
> I added the 'maxarray' param and set the value to
> 5 million pixels, as you suggested.
>
> On Windows IE 5.0 the pano consistently takes
> a little over 50 seconds to download.  I did not
> use any Javascript to make sure the param was set.
>
> On Netscape 4.7 it averaged to about 27 seconds.
> (No out of memory error, BTW.)
>
> So, in my case it would appear that the pano is
> downloading twice on IE 5.0 even with the maxarray
> param set to 5 million pixels.
>
> This pano is about 650,000 pixels.
>
> Best,
>
> Gummy
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Helmut Dersch" <#removed#>
> To: "Immersive Imaging" <#removed#>
> Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2000 7:14 AM
> Subject: Re: Slow image download in PTViewer/IE
>
> > Gummy Bear wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there any way to test this theory?
> > >
> >
> > Yes: try my suggestion.
> >
> > > It seems like it is taking longer with IE - but
> > > not three times longer.
> > >
> >
> > Depends on the image size. This was just an example.
> >
> > > Also, do you know if this size limitation is
> > > present in the next version of Navigator?
> > >
> > > If it's not, then it seems like you might have
> > > a similar problem with Navigator 6.0.  Also, in
> > > that case, your Javascript does not check the
> > > version of Navigator...
> > >
> >
> > No version of Netscape has this problem.
> >
> > Helmut Dersch
> >

--
Denis Gliksman
La Grange Numérique

Mail: #removed#
Site: http://www.la-grange-numerique.com

Tel 33 1 34 87 60 34
Fax 33 1 34 87 64 67
Mobile 06 07 72 75 25

Next message:

Previous message: